Dr John Crolla, of Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, says that the new policy will result in substantial numbers of liveborn children with hitherto preventable mental or physical handicaps. This represents, he contends, a substantial change in the outcome quality of prenatal testing offered to couples in the UK. ~ The Lancet, Jul 9
Industry-funded bioethics articles should not be published by professional journals, a prominent American bioethicist argues in The Lancet. Carl Elliott, of the University of Minnesota, says that mere disclosure of financial interests by his colleagues is unlikely to do away with conflicts of interest. This approach has not succeeded in eliminating bias amongst clinicians -- research shows that doctors who accept gifts are still more likely to prescribe drugs from a generous benefactor, even if they do not believe they have been influenced.
Articles on the ethics of stem-cell research have been funded by Geron, Elliott says, and the ethics of placebo-controlled trials for mood-altering drugs, has been funded by antidepressant manufacturers. "Disclosure policies raise a red flag and should be retained, but they do nothing to eliminate the real problem of industry funding, which is not secrecy but influence-peddling... If bioethics scholarship is to retain any measure of independence and credibility, it will need to take much stronger measures."
Dr Elliott's high-minded campaign to purify bioethics of the taint of undue influence has outraged some of his colleagues. Glenn McGee, editor of the American Journal of Bioethics (which was roundly criticised by Elliott), complained that "the notion that in taking funding from industry I or my colleagues became tools of industry is mean-spirited innuendo and nothing more."
The real problem is quite different, says McGee: "a well developed neo-conservative bioethics 'movement' now, a virtually unadulterated tool of the Bush administration that has most recently busied itself with apologetics for the Bush administration position on stem cell research."
The problem of industry ties to bioethics is clearly not a simple one. As McGee points out, medical schools rely heavily on industry funding, so even Elliott's work has been indirectly funded by industry. And he asserts that he cannot think of a single instance of corporate funding corrupting bioethicists' judgment -- with the possible exception of Republican donations to bolster the case for keeping Terri Schiavo alive. ~ Lancet, Jul 8; blog.bioethics.net
Hundreds of millions lost in California surgery scam
Doctors are generally assumed to be honest -- but an investigation into massive insurance fraud in southern California shows that this is not always the case. Hundreds of people, many of them recent immigrants unfamiliar with the US health case system, were apparently paid to undergo routine procedures while medical centres pocketed the insurance cheques. According to the New York Times, the FBI estimates that insurers have probably lost US$500 million in this scam. (The National Health Care Anti-Fraud association calculates that 3 or 5 per cent of the US$1.7 trillion spent on American health care in 2003 was lost to fraud - at least $51 billion.)
Earlier this year Blue Cross and Blue Shield companies from several states filed a civil suit against nearly a dozen clinics. They say that these centres recruited people "from across the country to come to the clinics and undergo completely unnecessary diagnostic and surgical procedures, so that the clinics and surgeons could submit phoney insurance claims." Some of the surgery was not only unnecessary but risky.
One couple interviewed by the Times, Julio Hernandez and Sandra Padilla, of Phoenix, visited a clinic in Anaheim several times and were paid about US$400 for each procedure. Then cheques arrived from insurers for tens of thousands of dollars. A lawyer from the clinic told them to hand over the cheques and threatened them with lawsuits, jail and deportation if they did not comply. ~ New York Times, Jul 10
Selling kidneys in Iraq
Iraq also has a problem with illegal surgery. The issue there is a black market in kidney transplants. Kidney disease is widespread and more than 5,000 Iraqis urgently need transplants. The problerm is acute enough for the Ministry of the Interior to have formed a special section to track down organ gangs. Its head told the UN news agency IRIN that three negotiators and a donor had recently been arrested. The donor had been forced to donate his kidney to pay back money to the gang.
Tapping into the black market is easy, according to IRIN. At the main gate of Bagdad's Karama hospital, a street vendor promises to organise a transplant. "I can get you a healthy kidney," he says. It will cost you US$2,000 to $3,000. You just have to give me your blood type and I will get if for you even before you have finished a cold Pepsi."
Doctors are not necessarily part of the trade, but tend not to ask many questions. "At the end of the day, it is saving a life," says Dr Karima Abbas, a surgeon at Al-Khayal Hospital. "We don't believe in the buying and selling of kidneys, but these are very difficult times in Iraq." ~ IRIN, Jul 6
IN BRIEF: terri Schiavo; abuse denied
Florida governor Jeb Bush has closed state inquiries into the Terri Schiavo case after a review by a state attorney. Prosecutors reviewing the evidence found no new information and said that it was unlikely that criminal acts were responsible for the Terri's collapse and subsequent brain damage in 1990. ~ St Petersburg Times, Jul 8
There are no widespread problems in the treatment of terror suspects by military health care workers, the US Army's surgeon- general has said after surveying about a thousand medical personnel. Lt Gen Kevin C. Kiley said that he could not verify allegations that doctors or medics had falsified death certificates or hid evidence of beatings. He admitted that he had found some problems in medical record-keeping and some vague policies, but these were being corrected. ~ AP, Jul 7